Remote Shunt
Calibration
|
Page 1 of 4
It is common knowledge -- or at least it should
be -- that shunt calibrating a remote bridge arm at
the instrument binding posts will introduce a
calibration error several times greater than the
error anticipated from leadwire desensitization
considerations alone. What probably is not common
knowledge is that the indicated calibration magnitude
will be increased, not decreased, as expected from
desensitization considerations. The significant point
is that if a remote bridge arm is shunt calibrated at
the instrument terminals and attempts are made to
mathematically or experimentally adjust gage factor
or instrument gain to correct the error, the
sensitivity will be adjusted in the wrong direction
and increase the error. Worse, perhaps, is that this
is an "unsafe" error, in that output from
the transducer being used is larger than the
instrument indicates.
To illustrate the point, two examples are shown for
strain gages: a
quarter-bridge
and a
full-bridge
(which could be any type of strain gaged
transducer). In both cases, the gages (
R
G
) are 120 ohms and have a gage factor (
K
) of 2. The shunt value (
R
SH
) of 59 880 ohms is selected because it produces
an indicator reading of 1000 microinch/inch when used
with 120 ohm gages, and there is no lead resistance.
For each example, the indicated calibration strain is
listed for:
- (A) calibration at the instrument terminals
- (B) calibration at the bridge arm by use of
dedicated calibration leads
- (C) calibration directly across the bridge arm.
Note that for high shunt values and reasonable lead
resistances, (B) and (C) are equal. Further, for (C)
-- and (B), if the values are approximately the same
-- the error can be removed by adjusting the gage
factor setting (i.e., gain) of the instrument.
(continued...)
|
|