|
S-T-C Mismatch
When a strain gage is employed on a material other
than that used in obtaining the manufacturer's
thermal output data for that lot of gages, an S-T-C
mismatch occurs. In such cases, the thermal output of
the gage will differ from the curve supplied in the
gage package. Consider, for example, strain
measurements made at an elevated temperature on Monel
with a strain gage of 06 S-T-C number, calibrated for
thermal output on 1018 steel (
thermal expansion table
). The thermal expansion characteristics of Monel are
somewhat different from 1018 steel, and the strain
gage will produce a correspondingly different thermal
output. Thus, if accurate strain measurement is
required, the thermal output characteristics of the
gage bonded to Monel must be measured over the test
temperature range as described
previously
. For small temperature excursions from room
temperature, the effect of the difference in
expansion properties between Monel and 1018 steel is
not very significant, and would commonly be
ignored.
On the other hand, when the difference in thermal
expansion properties between the thermal output
calibration material and the material to which the
gage is bonded for stress analysis is great, the
published thermal output curve cannot be used
directly for making corrections. Examples of this
occur in constantan strain gages with S-T-C numbers
of 30, 40, and 50. The principal application of these
gages would normally be strain measurement on
high-expansion coefficient plastics. But the thermal
(and other) properties of plastics vary significantly
from lot to lot and, because of formulation
differences, even more seriously from manufacturer to
manufacturer of nominally the same plastic. This
fact, along with the general instability of plastics
properties with time, temperature, humidity, etc.,
creates a situation in which there are no suitable
plastic materials for use in directly measuring the
thermal output characteristics of gages with S-T-C
numbers of 30 and above. As an admittedly
less-than-satisfactory alternative, the thermal
output data provided with these gages are measured on
1018 steel specimens because of the stability and
repeatability of this material.
As a result of the foregoing, it is always
preferable when measuring strains on plastics or
other materials with 30, 40, or 50 S-T-C gages (at
temperatures different from the instrument balance
temperature) to first experimentally determine the
thermal output of the gage on the test material as
described in a
previous section
. Using these data, corrections are then made as
usual by subtracting algebraically the thermal output
from the measured strain.
For use as a quick first approximation, the
thermal output characteristics of 30, 40, or 50 S-T-C
gages on a plastic (or on any other material) of
known coefficient of expansion can be estimated by
reversing the clockwise rotation of the thermal
output curve which occurred when measuring the
characteristics on a steel specimen. Assume, for
example, that a 30 S-T-C gage is to be used for
strain measurements on a plastic with a constant
expansion coefficient of 35E-6/deg F (63E-6/degC)
over the test temperature range. Assume also that the
expansion coefficient of 1018 steel is constant at
6.7E-6/deg F (12.1E-6/deg C) over the same
temperature range. With the strain indicator set at
the gage factor of the strain gage, so that
=
, and noting that the ratio
is normally close to unity for A-alloy gages, Eq.(
504.2
) can be rewritten in simplified (and approximate)
form as follows:
Eq.(504.6)
(
Note
: Although the remainder of this example is carried
through in only the Fahrenheit system to avoid
overcomplicating the notation, the same procedure
produces the equivalent result in the Celsius
system.)
When specifically applied to 6.7 and 35E-6/deg F
materials, Eq.(504.6) becomes:
Eq.(504.7a)
and,
Eq.(504.7b)
Solving Eq. (504.7a) for
, and substituting into Eq.(504.7b),
Eq.(504.8)
In other words, Eq.(504.8) states that the thermal
output curve for the 30 S-T-C gage mounted on 1018
steel can be converted to that for the same gage
mounted on a 35E-6/deg F plastic by adding to the
original curve the product of the difference in
expansion coefficients and the temperature deviation
from room temperature (
always carrying the proper sign for the
temperature deviation
). Figure 6 shows the thermal output curve for a 30
S-T-C gage as originally measured on a 1018 steel
specimen, and as rotated counterclockwise to
approximate the response on a plastic with an
expansion coefficient of 35E-6/deg F.
Fig. 6 - Rotation of the thermal output function
[from (A) to (B)] when a strain gage is installed on
a material of higher themal expansion than that used
by the manufacturer in S-T-C calibration.
The procedure just demonstrated is quite general,
and can be used to predict the approximate effect of
any mismatch between the expansion coefficient used
for obtaining the thermal output curve on the gage
package data sheet and the expansion coefficient of
some other material on which the gage is to be
installed. Although generally applicable, the
procedure is also limited in accuracy because the
expansion coefficients in Eq.(504.6) are themselves
functions of temperature for most materials. A
further limitation in accuracy can occur when
measuring strains on plastics or other materials with
poor heat transfer characteristics. If, due to
self-heating, the temperature of the strain gage is
significantly higher than that of the test part, the
thermal output data supplied in the gage package
cannot be applied meaningfully.
It should be borne in mind that the foregoing
procedure gives, at best, a rough approximation to
the actual thermal output when there is a mismatch
between the expansion coefficient of the test
material and the selected S-T-C number of the strain
gage. When accurate correction for thermal output is
required, direct measurement, as
described previously
, is highly recommended.
|