|
(
... continued
)
Because of its numerous advantages, shunt
calibration is the normal procedure for verifying or
setting the output of a strain gage instrument
relative to a predetermined mechanical input at the
sensor. The subject matter of this publication
encompasses a variety of commonly occurring bridge
circuit arrangements and shunt-calibration
procedures. In all cases, it should be noted, the
assumptions are made that the excitation for the
bridge circuit is provided by a constant-voltage
power supply
1
, and that the input impedance of any instrument
applied across the output terminals of the bridge
circuit is effectively infinite. The latter condition
is approximately representative of most modern
strain-measurement instruments in which the bridge
output is "balanced" by injecting an equal
and opposite voltage developed in a separate network.
It is also assumed that there are no auxiliary
resistors (such as those commonly used in transducers
for temperature compensation, span adjustment, etc.)
in either the bridge circuit proper or in the
circuitry supplying bridge power.
1
In general, the principles employed
here are equally applicable to constant-current
systems, but the shunt-calibration relationships will
differ where nonlinearity considerations are
involved.
Although simple in concept, shunt calibration is
actually much more complex than is generally
appreciated. The full potential of this technique for
accurate instrument calibration can be realized only
by careful consideration of the errors which can
occur when the method is misused. Of primary concern
are:
- The choice of the bridge arm to be shunted,
along with the placement of the shunt connections
in the bridge circuit.
- Calculation of the proper shunt resistance to
simulate a prescribed strain level or to produce a
prescribed instrument output.
- Wheatstone bridge nonlinearity (when
calibrating at high strain levels).
Because of the foregoing, different
shunt-calibration relationships are sometimes
required for different sets of circumstances. It is
particularly important to distinguish between two
modes of shunt calibration which are referred to in
this publication, somewhat arbitrarily, as
instrument scaling
and
instrument verification
.
(
continued ...
)
|