(
... continued
)
The procedures described up to this point have
referred only to instrument calibration for
compressive strains. This seems natural enough, since
shunting always produces a decrease in the arm
resistance, corresponding to compression. There are
occasions, however, when upscale (tension)
calibration is more convenient or otherwise
preferable. The easiest and most accurate way to
accomplish this is still by shunt calibration.
The figure below illustrates the simple Wheatstone
bridge circuit again, but with the calibration
resistor positioned to shunt the adjacent bridge arm,
(usually referred to as the "dummy" in a
quarter-bridge circuit).
Upscale (tensile) calibration by shunting adjacent
bridge arm.
As demonstrated by Eq. (
514.1a
), a decrease in the resistance of the adjacent arm
will produce a bridge output opposite in sign to that
obtained by shunting
, causing the instrument to register a tensile
strain. Thus, a simulated compressive strain
in
, generated by shunting that arm, can be
interpreted
as a simulated tensile strain
in
. The special subscript notation is temporarily
introduced here because the two simulated strains are
not exactly equal in magnitude. For calibration at
low strain levels, the difference in magnitude
between
and
is small enough that the relationships given in Eqs.
(
514.5
) through (
514.7
) are sufficiently accurate for most practical
applications. The error in the simulated tensile
strain, in percent, is approximately equal to the
gage factor times the strain, in percent.
The foregoing error arises because shunting
to produce a simulated compressive strain in that
arm, and then interpreting the instrument output as
due to a simulated tensile strain in
, involves effectively a two-fold simulation which
is twice as sensitive to Wheatstone bridge
nonlinearity. Accounting for the nonlinearity, as
shown in
a later section
, permits developing a shunt-calibration
relationship for precisely simulating tensile strains
of any magnitude.
|