Errors, Corrections and Limitations
The obvious aim of experimental stress analysis is
to determine the significant stresses in a test
object as accurately as necessary to assure product
reliability under expected service conditions. As
demonstrated in the preceding sections of this
publication, the process of obtaining the principal
stresses involves three basic, and sequential, steps:
- Measurement of surface strains with a strain
gage rosette.
- Transformation of measured strains to principal
strains.
- Conversion of principal strains to principal
stresses.
Each step in this procedure has its own
characteristic error sources and limits of
applicability; and the stress analyst must carefully
consider these to avoid potentially serious errors in
the resulting principal stresses.
Of first importance is that the measured strains
be as free as possible of error. Strain measurements
with rosettes are subject, of course, to the same
errors (thermal output, transverse sensitivity,
leadwire resistance effects, etc.) as those with
single-element strain gages. Thus, the same
controlling and/or corrective measures are required
to obtain accurate data. For instance, signal
attenuation due to leadwire resistance should be
eliminated by
shunt
calibrations
, or by numerically correcting the strain data for
the calculated attenuation, based on the known
resistances of the leadwires and strain gages.
(
continued ...
)
|